
Let’s be honest, electrical drawings are one of those things everyone knows are important… right up until the day you desperately need them.
A motor trips, production stops, someone asks “which breaker is feeding that skid?”, and suddenly the site is running on guesswork, half-memories, and a faded folder that hasn’t been updated since the last big shutdown. Sound familiar?
Over the past few months, we’ve seen a sharp rise in requests from clients across multiple industries asking for one simple thing:
“Can you come in and tell us what we’ve actually got?”
Sometimes that means checking whether the electrical documentation matches reality. Other times, it means building the documentation from scratch because there isn’t any. Either way, if you’re responsible for safety, uptime, compliance, or future expansion, electrical “as built” accuracy is the foundation.
In this article, we’ll break down what “as built” really means, why it matters, what typically goes wrong on real sites, and how IDEA helps you get to a clear, compliant, maintainable set of documentation.
Think of your electrical drawings like a map. If the map is wrong, it’s worse than having no map at all, because it creates confidence in the wrong decisions.
And in electrical systems, wrong decisions can mean:
Let’s unpack the big reasons.
If you operate a site, you’re expected to manage electrical risk properly. That includes knowing what’s installed, how it’s protected, and whether it meets current standards.
When drawings are missing or outdated, it becomes harder to prove that:
Even worse, engineers and technicians may end up working with assumptions instead of facts. And electricity is not forgiving.
In operations, time matters. When a line is down, you don’t want a detective story. You want answers.
Accurate as-built drawings mean:
In simple terms: good drawings reduce downtime and reduce stress.
Every site has a story. Here are some of the most common ones we’re seeing right now.
Yes, this still happens. More often than you’d think.
It’s common on older sites, or sites that have changed hands, or sites where the “documents” are a mixture of partial PDFs, old prints, and sketches kept in someone’s drawer.
And when there’s no baseline, even small changes become risky because nobody can reliably say what’s connected to what.
A lot of sites are expanding production right now—new packaging lines, new process skids, new utilities, electrification projects, heat pumps, additional pumps, compressors, you name it.
But here’s the catch: many sites don’t truly know whether the existing electrical infrastructure can handle new demand.
So projects start with big questions:
If you can’t answer those early, expansion becomes slower, more expensive, and more uncertain.
One scenario we’ve seen first-hand: the site electrical engineer was retiring, and they held an incredible amount of site knowledge in their head.
They knew:
When that person leaves without capturing the knowledge, the site doesn’t just lose a colleague—it loses control of the electrical system story.
Sites evolve. That’s normal.
But over time, the “as built” file can drift away from what’s physically installed, especially if:
It’s like renovating your house for 10 years but still using the original floor plan. Eventually, the drawing becomes fiction.
A proper electrical survey isn’t a quick walkaround with a clipboard. Done properly, it’s a structured verification of what’s installed, how it’s protected, and how it behaves as a system.
At IDEA, we can build and verify your electrical network from:
That includes gathering the right site data—ratings, settings, cable details, board schedules, and how loads are actually connected.
We don’t just list components. We check the engineering logic behind them:
This is where the real value sits, because it’s the difference between “documentation” and “assurance”.
Here’s where things get practical and powerful.
IDEA uses an 18th Edition electrical software package that allows us to build your full electrical network and test it against key design checks.
It’s like running a “health check” on your electrical system—based on actual network structure, not generic assumptions.
Disconnection time and protective device suitability
Disconnection time isn’t just theory. It’s a safety requirement.
We check whether your protective devices will disconnect within the required times under fault conditions, based on:
We check the essentials that often hide problems:
These are the things that can quietly become non-compliant after years of modifications or load changes.
Ever had a fault on one circuit trip a much bigger breaker upstream taking out a whole area?
That’s a coordination issue.
We assess discrimination between upstream and downstream protective devices so that faults are cleared as locally as possible, reducing disruption and improving reliability.
We’re big believers in leaving you with something useful, not a report that sits on a shelf.
Our report highlights:
It’s written so that engineering, maintenance, and management can all understand the “so what”.
You receive a full set of updated “as built” drawings in CAD format, so your team can:
Where appropriate, we can leave you with a structured network model that becomes your baseline for:
It turns “unknown” into “managed”.
Different sites need different approaches. We support clients across all of these scenarios.
For greenfield projects, the focus is building robust design and documentation from day one so you don’t inherit problems later.
When you’re adding new equipment, we help you confirm:
So your project doesn’t get derailed halfway through procurement or installation.
Brownfield sites are where “as built” accuracy matters most, because the site history is complex.
We help you get confidence that what’s installed is:
Not sure where you stand? Here are some quick warning signs:
If you’re nodding along to even two of those, it’s worth investigating.
You don’t want a box-ticking exercise. You want clarity and confidence.
We focus on real-world outcomes:
Electrical systems aren’t just engineering objects—they’re operational realities.
We work with your teams to understand:
That makes the outputs more accurate and more useful.
If you’re unsure about the current status of your electrical drawings or you want assurance before expanding, modifying, or upgrading, let’s talk.
IDEA can help you review your design and documentation, identify issues, and provide updated “as built” CAD drawings along with a clear report highlighting any critical errors within your network.
To find out more, contact our lead EC&I engineer: Craig Berry
What to prepare before the first call
If you have them, it helps to share:
Don’t worry if you don’t have everything, we can still guide the right next step.
Conclusion
If your “as built” electrical drawings are out of date, incomplete, or missing, you’re essentially running your site with a blurred dashboard. You might still be moving forward but you’re doing it with unnecessary risk and avoidable uncertainty.
The good news? Getting control doesn’t have to be painful. With the right site survey, a structured 18th Edition modelling approach, and updated CAD documentation, you can turn electrical unknowns into a reliable baseline for safety, uptime, and future expansion.
If you’re planning changes, or you simply want confidence that what you have is compliant and accurately documented, IDEA can help you get there.
“As built” means the drawings reflect what is actually installed on site, not what was originally designed. It includes changes made during construction, modifications over time, and any deviations from the original plan.
Yes. We can carry out a site survey, capture the installed system, and produce a full set of “as built” CAD drawings along with checks to support compliance and future maintenance.
No. We support a wide range of sites and industries from smaller facilities to complex multi-board industrial plants. The approach scales to the site need.
It allows the electrical network to be checked from incomer to final circuits for key compliance items like protective device suitability, disconnection time, volt drop, earth loop impedance, cable sizing, and discrimination.
Common trigger points are: before adding new plant, during expansion planning, after repeated trips/downtime events, when key personnel are leaving, or when you suspect drawings no longer match reality.