
If you run a process site, heat isn’t a “utility” – it’s the heartbeat. Steam and hot water quietly power the things that keep product moving and quality consistent: distillation, evaporation, sterilisation, Clean-In-Place (CIP), space heating, washdown, and all the little temperature nudges that stop a process from drifting out of spec.
The challenge is that heat demand in industry is messy. It’s not one tidy load. It’s often multiple loads, at different temperatures, starting and stopping across the day. And historically, the simplest way to feed that appetite was to burn fuel and make steam.
Now we’re in a different era. Carbon targets are tightening, energy costs swing like a pendulum, and sites are being asked to do more with less. That’s why decarbonising process heating has become one of the most important (and most misunderstood) parts of the net zero journey.
Electrification is powerful, but it’s not magic. Think of it like switching from a petrol car to an EV: it’s not just the vehicle, it’s charging, route planning, peak demand, and infrastructure.
For a plant, “electrify heat” quickly turns into questions like:
This is where many projects either become brilliant… or become expensive science experiments. The good news is that there’s a practical path through it.
Two distilleries can look identical on paper and behave completely differently in real life. One has spare electrical capacity and plenty of low-grade waste heat. Another is landlocked for space, constrained by ageing distribution pipework, and already close to its maximum import capacity.
That’s why a decarbonisation strategy needs to be site-specific. If you start by picking the technology first (“we want a heat pump” or “we want an electric boiler”), you risk designing the solution around the idea, not around the plant.
A good study doesn’t just list options—it builds a defensible engineering case for the right options.
This is where we separate real opportunities from “sounds good” ideas. We map heat sources and heat sinks, including:
If you don’t know today’s truth, you can’t prove tomorrow’s benefits. A baseline model clarifies:
Once you have this, the solution becomes less guesswork and more engineering.
Not all heat is created equal. There’s a big difference between:
A lot of plants default to steam because it’s versatile. But if most of your demand is actually lower temperature, then using steam is like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.
Batch loads (like CIP) create peaks. Peaks drive bigger boilers, bigger connections, bigger everything. If you can smooth peaks—using storage, sequencing, or pre-heating—you can often cut the “design maximum” dramatically. That’s a direct lever for lowering capex and making electrification viable.
Your refrigeration plant is basically a heat pump already—just running in the opposite direction. The heat it rejects to atmosphere can often be recovered. Condenser heat is frequently one of the most reliable sources because it’s steady and predictable.
Air compressors reject heat. Vacuum systems reject heat. Even certain control cabinets and hydraulic systems reject heat (small individually, but meaningful at site scale if aggregated intelligently).
Warm effluent, product cooling loops, flash vapours—these are the “forgotten rivers” of energy on a site. With the right approach, they become feedstock for heat recovery.
A heat pump is like a “heat elevator”. It picks up heat from a low temperature source and lifts it up to a higher temperature where you can use it.
Instead of creating heat by burning fuel, it moves heat using electricity. That’s why it can be so efficient.
Heat pumps are often described by COP (Coefficient of Performance). A COP of 3 means:
That’s why heat pumps can reduce net energy consumption and carbon emissions—especially as electricity gets cleaner.
Heat pumps shine when:
The bigger the lift (difference between source and sink temperature), the harder the heat pump has to work. That last push to very high temperatures can be disproportionately expensive. This is one reason hybrid solutions are so attractive.
CIP is often a perfect match for high-temperature hot water heat pumps. Why?
Space heating might not feel “industrial”, but on many sites it’s a meaningful year-round load. If you can feed a low/medium temperature heating network with a heat pump, you free up steam capacity and reduce boiler firing.
Even if your process ultimately needs steam, you can often pre-heat feeds using hot water or recovered heat. That reduces steam duty—meaning a smaller electric boiler (or less electrical upgrade) later.
Steam isn’t just “hot water at a higher temperature”. It involves phase change and pressure, and the temperatures can jump fast. That makes steam generation via heat pumps more complex, and in many cases the technology is still emerging compared to hot water systems.
Steam heat pumps are developing, and we’re seeing more interest and pilot applications. But for many plants today, the fastest practical route is:
Electric boilers are simple in principle:
If your electricity supply is low carbon (and increasingly it is), electric boilers can deliver a rapid emissions reduction.
This is the catch. Electric boilers can demand serious power.
It’s not just “install the boiler”. You may need:
Electricity costs can be heavily influenced by peak demand. If your steam system spikes, that can translate into higher demand charges. That’s why demand reduction and smoothing strategies can be as valuable as the technology itself.
This is the approach we see delivering the best balance of carbon savings, practicality, and cost.
Heat pumps tackle:
Electric boilers then provide:
Think of it like renovating a house:
Heat pumps improve efficiency. Electric boilers provide coverage and simplicity. Together, they reduce both carbon and the required scale of electrical upgrades.
You don’t need a textbook pinch analysis to benefit from pinch thinking. The principle is simple:
If controls aren’t designed properly, heat recovery systems get bypassed. The plant keeps running, but the savings vanish. Good integration means:
Heat pumps aren’t “install and forget”. They need:
Some sites chase capex-only decisions and end up with high operating costs. Others chase efficiency and overcomplicate. The best projects usually:
As the grid decarbonises, electrification becomes increasingly attractive. But you still need to consider:
A practical approach is often:
Get the data. Confirm what’s real. Identify losses and constraints.
Fix distribution losses. Recover obvious waste heat. Optimise controls.
Deploy heat pumps where there’s a strong match. Use electric boilers to cover remaining steam.
Install metering. Track performance. Fine-tune sequences. Lock in the savings.
At Integro Design Engineering Associates (IDEA) Ltd., we support sites through the full journey:
We’re not tied to one supplier or one technology. That means we can focus on what your site actually needs, not what fits a catalogue.
If you’re exploring electrification projects, whether that’s high-temperature heat pumps, electric boilers, or a hybrid solution, we can help you map the best route from “idea” to “implemented”.
Decarbonising process plant heating doesn’t have to be overwhelming. The trick is to stop looking for a single silver bullet and start building a practical, site-specific strategy. High-temperature hot water heat pumps can unlock big efficiency gains by recovering and upgrading waste heat. Electric boilers can then deliver low-carbon steam, especially once heat pumps have reduced the steam demand to a more manageable level. When you combine both technologies with solid engineering, sensible integration, and a phased roadmap, you get a solution that’s technically robust and economically credible.
Our team at Integro Design Engineering Associates (IDEA) Ltd. is currently engaged in exciting electrification and heat recovery projects. If you’d like to explore what’s possible for your site, get in touch – we’ll be happy to review opportunities and help you shape a decarbonisation strategy that fits your operations and your sustainability goals.
Not always. They work best where there’s a stable waste heat source and a significant hot water demand. A site study is the quickest way to confirm suitability.
In many cases, heat pumps can reduce steam demand substantially, but full steam replacement is often challenging today. A hybrid approach (heat pumps + electric boilers) is commonly the most practical.
Electrical infrastructure and grid capacity. Many sites need upgrades to transformers, switchgear, and cabling to support large electric boiler loads.
Start with heat mapping. If you can reduce steam demand by recovering heat into hot water duties, do that first—then size the electric boiler for the remaining steam demand.
Develop a baseline energy model, map sources and sinks, shortlist options, and quantify capex, opex, and carbon impact. The business case becomes clear when it’s built on real site data.